From January-July 2021, American companies paid at least $565 million in extra taxes as a result of GSP expiration. Imports into 36 states (plus Puerto Rico) paid at least $1 million in tariffs from January-July 2021 due to GSP expiration. The map below shows estimated tariffs paid for products claiming GSP by state.

July was the most expensive month of GSP expiration yet for 12 states: Georgia, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. In Rhode Island, tariffs costs in July were more than the previously three months combined. Tantalum metals used primarily to manufacture electronic components from Kazakhstan and Christmas lights from Cambodia – the two products driving the Rhode Island increase – show the diverse impacts of GSP expiration.

GSP expiration costs have a direct, negative impact on American workers:

• “GSP can be the difference between making a profit or a loss and without profits we obviously can’t increase wages and benefits” says Charlie Smith of BROSCO, a 4th generation, family-owned millwork distributor in Massachusetts and Maine. “Continued losses put all of our 360 workers’ jobs and livelihoods at risk.”
  
• “We are having challenges staying competitive“ says Ajay Kochhar of A&S Distributors in Salida, California. The 7-worker company has paid over $60,000 in extra taxes on food products from Fiji because of GSP expiration. “We can’t hire and give employees full benefits as this is a major increase.”
  
• “The tariffs when added to the rapidly escalating costs of containers have been devastating” says Sandra Colyer of Lily Koo LLC in Jamestown, North Carolina. “Employees laid off due to Covid are slowly being brought back, but return to work would occur more quickly if money was not being spent on tariffs.”

It is critical that Congress renew GSP – with refunds for tariffs paid – as soon as possible. We strongly encourage GSP importers hurt by expiration to answer our new survey here. As always, no company-specific details will be published without permission.

Due to GSP expiration, Ciranda has paid over $209,000 in extra tariffs on imports of tapioca powders and syrups, coconut products, rice syrup and powders from Brazil, Pakistan, Philippines, and Thailand. The need to pass these costs onto customers led sales to fall. Even if tariffs paid (eventually) are refunded, those lost sales can’t be regained. As an employee-owned company, everyone at Ciranda is impacted by those lost sales and profits.

Ciranda is a great example of the kind of trade GSP is meant to promote. Its qualification process includes an in-person visit to every supplier. While on-site, it observes each ingredient’s journey from the field to the processing plant. In addition to evaluating product quality, it surveys working conditions, fair labor practices, and the overall environmental health of the project. In 2020, Ciranda published a book highlighting the farmers around the world growing their product.

By eliminating U.S. tariffs on sustainable food ingredients, GSP helps companies like Ciranda do “more good” for workers and the environment in developing countries and the United States. Their example also highlights the risk of imposing too many eligible criteria on GSP countries for which higher tariffs are the only possible punishment. No matter how well-intentioned a new GSP criterion (e.g., on environment) may be, terminating GSP often hurts those meeting or exceeding even the highest standards. That’s why the Coalition believes Congress should consider changes to mitigate any punitive actions as part of GSP renewal, such as supporting partial (instead of full) terminations and/or creating a mechanism for good actors to retain benefits.

Note: Ciranda’s story came from a new Coalition survey on expiration impacts. GSP importers can take the survey here.

In the first five months of expiration, American companies paid at least $397 million in extra taxes as a result of GSP expiration. Companies in 32 states paid at least $1 million in tariffs from January-May 2021 due to GSP expiration. The map below shows estimated tariffs for products claiming GSP paid by state in that period.

May was the most expensive month of GSP expiration yet both nationally and for 19 states: Alabama, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Virginia. In three states – Colorado, Kansas, and New Mexico – tariffs paid in May were at least double any of the previous four months.

While many believe the United States has low tariffs, Colorado companies have paid extra tariffs averaging 11.7% due to GSP expiration. Companies in Maine, Montana, New Hampshire, Utah, and Wisconsin have all paid extra tariffs average 7-10%.

The data on tariffs paid is a conservative estimate, and the real figure likely is higher. Why? Estimates only capture products that continued to claim GSP despite expiration. Yet imports of many products that traditionally get GSP have not claimed it in 2021. Tariffs paid on those imports still would be eligible for refunds in the event of a retroactive renewal, but importers would need to file manual requests.

It is critical that Congress renew GSP – with refunds for tariffs paid – as soon as possible. Companies that want to help the Coalition for GSP educate policymakers on who is hurt by expiration (and how) should:

• join the Coalition for GSP
• add their name to the free GSP supporter list
• answer our very short survey on GSP expiration impacts to date

California accounts for more than a quarter of GSP savings, more than the next 3 states – New York, Florida, Texas – combined. Georgia, New Jersey, Ohio, Illinois, Washington, and Pennsylvania round out the top 10 states for GSP savings in 2020.

Estimated GSP savings for Colorado grew from $4 million in 2019 to $14 million in 2020, by far the largest increase. Estimated GSP savings also grew in Wisconsin (+$869,000), Arkansas (+$478,000), Washington (+$300,000), Delaware (+$73,000), and Wyoming (+$34,000). Estimated savings fell in all other states.

While Covid-19 had big impacts on GSP imports in the spring, declines were largely due to country suspensions. Excluding products impacted by country suspensions (e.g., India, Turkey, Thailand), most states’ GSP savings grew. For example, New York’s GSP savings grew by $15 million on non-impacted products but fell by $2.5 million overall due to country suspensions. Similarly, Texas’ savings GSP by $9 million on non-impacted products but fell by over $7 million overall.

Since GSP expired on December 31, American likely have paid about $110 million in tariffs that previously would’ve been “GSP savings.” It is critical that Congress renew GSP – with refunds for tariffs paid – as soon as possible. To help the Coalition for GSP educate policymakers on who is hurt by expiration (and how), companies are strongly encouraged to:

• join the Coalition for GSP
• add their name to the free GSP supporter list
• answer our very short survey on GSP expiration impacts to date

GSP’s current authorization expires on December 31, 2020, and Congress must pass legislation renewing GSP this year for benefits to continue into 2021 and beyond. Companies that want GSP renewed should add their name to the free GSP supporter list.

By GSP savings, California was far and away the largest GSP beneficiary. California’s estimated $270 million in tariffs waved was nearly as much as the next four largest states – Florida, New York, Texas, New Jersey – combined.

While overall savings levels were lower, imports into Montana and Maine would face the highest average tariffs without GSP (10.9% and 10.6%, respectively). The high average tariff waived results from the dominance of travel goods imports, which can face tariffs up to 20.0% without GSP. GSP waives tariffs averaging about 7.0% on imports into Utah, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Colorado, well above the 5.0% national average.

U.S. companies saved about $180 million in tariffs on imports from Thailand – more than any other country – though GSP eligibility for about 1/3 of imports its products were removed in April 2020. Cambodia was the second most important country for U.S. savings at $169 million, following by Indonesia at $150 million. Despite being GSP-eligible for only 5 months, India was the fourth-most important country in terms of savings at $121 million. Like the states, countries such as Burma and Cambodia where travel goods are most important GSP products had the highest average tariffs waived.

GSP imports were up by 15 percent – and tariffs savings were up by 17 percent – compared to a year earlier. Some states such as Nebraska and Maryland saw much larger increases in GSP imports and savings compared to the previous year, as shown in the graphic below.

GSP saved Nebraska companies $105,000 thousand in June, up $42,000 (68 percent) compared to one year earlier. Activated carbon from the Philippines, copper alloys and rubber stoppers from India, and aluminum frames from Thailand contributed most to Nebraska’s GSP increases.

GSP saved Maryland companies $2.1 million in June, up over $450,000 (28 percent) compared to one year earlier. Silicon from Kazakhstan, carbides from South Africa, and zinc from India contributed most to Maryland’s GSP increases.

In addition to Nebraska and Maryland, companies in 17 other states saw GSP savings increase by at least 20 percent, including: Alabama, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Indiana, Louisiana, Maine, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin.

Savings on GSP imports from Lebanon increased by 58 percent compared to June of last year. Illinois companies’ purchases of nuts accounted for nearly $250,000 of the GSP imports from Lebanon. GSP eliminated about $471,000 in import taxes on steering wheels in June, with more than a fifth of those savings on imports into Michigan.

GSP renewal appears to be having a very positive impact on American companies – and their sourcing from GSP countries.

Based on data released last week, American importers saved $57 million in November 2015 as a result of the program’s reinstatement in late July 2015. In total, GSP saved American companies $230 million between August and November 2015.

With the program back in place, GSP usage appears to be climbing. GSP savings in each of the last 4 months exceeded the average monthly tariffs paid during the 2-year expiration. That is true despite the fact that several major GSP imports (e.g., plywood from Indonesia) have lost GSP benefits since the program was reinstated.

Increased GSP usage plays out at the state level as well:

• GSP savings in November 2015 exceeded the tariffs paid during any of the 24 months of GSP expiration for 7 states: Colorado, Kansas, Michigan, Mississippi, South Carolina, Wisconsin, and Wyoming
• GSP savings in August, September, or October exceeded tariffs paid during any expiration month for 8 others states: Alabama, Arkansas, Missouri, New Hampshire, New York, Ohio, Utah, and Washington
• In Mississippi, GSP savings in 3 of the 4 months since reinstatement exceeded the tariffs paid during any expiration month: August, October, November
• GSP savings in two different months since reinstatement exceeded the tariffs paid during any expiration month for 7 other states: Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, South Carolina, Wisconsin, Wyoming

Of course, those savings are on top of the $1.3+ billion in refunds due to companies for tariffs paid during expiration. Customs announced that 98 percent of the automatic refunds had been processed by late September. The total refund value will grow as companies had until December 28 to request refunds for products that did not claim GSP during the expiration.

All of which has had a positive impact on companies, as detailed here, here, here, here, or here. If you have a good story about how GSP renewal is benefiting your business, we want to hear it. You can either email directly so or answer the questions here.

Instead of having that money on hand to pay employees, purchase new materials, and otherwise invest in their business, American companies are forced to pay this money to Customs at the border. Companies like Vortex Optics in Wisconsin, Touchstone Crystal in Rhode Island, and many, many others.

For those who value precision, the estimated taxes on (previously) GSP-eligible imports in August was:
Importers of select products were particularly hard hit. Telescopic sights from the Philippines, building stone from Brazil, pesticides and PET resins from India, prepared foods from Thailand, and plywood from Indonesia each faced between $500,000 and $1.2 million in new taxes in August because of GSP expiration. Many other products faced more than $100,000 in new taxes in the first month without GSP.

If your company is one of those being harmed by expiration, be sure to join the 360+ companies and associations on the GSP Supporter List by adding your name here. You can also contact us directly by emailing Dan Anthony.

Just as the arrival of September means something different for each person, the way GSP expiration impacts specific companies can also vary greatly. Past research has shown that the overall cost to American companies is about $2 million per day. We won’t know the actual value for the first month of expiration until the August trade data are released in a month or so, but we can look at responses from our August recess survey to some of the company-specific impacts.

For some, expiration was felt immediately. Vortex Optics in Middleton, Wisconsin paid $150,000 in new taxes while Congress was out of DC in August, and expects to pay another $100,000 this month if GSP remains expired. Those taxes are “putting a severe financial strain” on the 100+ employee business according to Vortex Optics President Daniel Hamilton.

For others like Far East American, a Los Angeles-based importer of tropical plywood, GSP expiration hasn’t hurt…yet. Far East American didn’t import any (previously) GSP-eligible shipments in August, but the company expects to pay more than $250,000 in tariffs in September because of GSP expiration.

Finally, there are others for which GSP expiration means no imports at all. One company in Florida (that wishes to remain anonymous) must bid in the next two weeks on business for 2014. Without GSP in place for imports from Indonesia, it cannot match prices of similar goods from China and Vietnam. As a result, GSP expiration likely will cause the two-person company to lose out on a $2 million contract – a huge deal for a very small company!

These are just a handful of the survey responses, and we’ll post more in the coming days and weeks. If you’re a GSP importer, please fill out this survey so we know how expiration is impacting your company (as you can see above, there’s an option to remain anonymous).

Wisconsin companies imported an estimated $146 million under GSP in 2011, saving them on average 3.3%. India was the most important source of GSP imports, accounting for about 31 percent of the tariff savings. Cocoa paste was Wisconsin’s top import under GSP in 2011.

Yet GSP is set to expire on July 31, 2013, and companies could face tariffs higher tariffs starting on August 1 if Congress does not pass legislation renewing GSP. When GSP expired at the end of 2010, American companies paid nearly $2 million per day, every day, until Congress finally acted 11 months later!

This graphic shows just some of the negative impacts from the last GSP expiration. It also helps explain why more than 335 companies and associations – including at least 8 in Wisconsin – joined the 2011 GSP Supporter List urging renewal of the program when it last expired.

Are you a Wisconsin company that would be hurt by GSP expiration? If so, please take 30 seconds to let Congress know by adding your name to our free 2013 GSP Supporter List right now.