The top states by GSP savings have been fairly consistent over the years. California accounts for more than a quarter of GSP savings – about as much as the next 4 states (Florida, New York, Texas, New Jersey) combined. Washington and Tennessee have moved into the top 10 states in 2020, replacing Pennsylvania and North Carolina.

Savings are down sharply, from $555 million in 2019 to $407 million in 2020. The map below shows the widespread declines, with the Mountain West being a notable exception. Washington, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, and Arizona form a string of growth states from the Canadian to Mexican borders. Colorado’s savings increased over 150% from 2019, largely driven by a jump in backpack imports. Massachusetts is the only other state where GSP savings are up in the first half of 2020.

Savings declined by over 40% in more than 20 states, including a whopping 78% in Vermont. GSP savings also declined by 67% in Montana and Oklahoma, 63% in North Dakota, 61% in Michigan, 60% in Minnesota, and 52% in West Virginia.

Declines are NOT due to Covid-19. American companies have paid up to $183 million in extra tariffs in 2020 due to GSP suspensions for India, Turkey, and Thailand. In the first half of 2019, tariffs paid due to suspensions (India and Turkey only) were about $35 million. Add those potential savings to actual savings in both years, and the first half totals were nearly identical ($590 million) in spite of Covid-19-related declines. Our next post will dig into state-by-state costs in 2020 associated with the suspensions.

Despite the slight overall decline, some states such as West Virginia and Nevada saw very large increases in GSP imports and savings compared to February 2016, as shown in the graphic below.

GSP saved West Virginia companies $91,000 in February, up $36,000 (65 percent) compared to one year earlier. Chemicals and mining tools from India and electrical conductors from Ecuador contributed most to West Virginia’s GSP increases.

GSP saved Nevada companies $330,000 in February, up $128,000 (63 percent) compared to one year earlier. Plastics accessories (e.g., wallets, glasses cases) from India, flourides (chemicals) from Thailand, and tungsten concentrates from Bolivia contributed most to Nevada’s GSP increases.

In addition to West Virginia and Nevada, companies in 10 other states saw GSP savings increase by at least 20 percent, including: Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

Savings on GSP imports from Kenya increased by 153 percent compared to February last year. New Jersey companies’ purchases of nuts were among the top GSP imports from Kenya. GSP eliminated about $265,000 in import taxes on gelatin in February, with about of those savings on imports from Iowa.

More monthly GSP import and savings highlights are on our Graphics page.

REMINDER: GSP expires at the end of 2017. Click here to learn about ways to take action and support GSP renewal this year.

• total GSP imports, tariffs savings, and average tariffs waived on account of GSP in 2016;
• companies importing GSP-eligible products;
• top GSP imports by product type;
• top GSP source countries by tariff savings, and
• the extent to which recent GSP expiration periods prevented “real-time” user benefits.

GSP usage differs greatly between states, from the types of products they import to the dependence on suppliers in specific countries. For example:

• Colorado companies saved $4.5 million on imports of about $60 million, meaning average tariffs waived of about 7.5 percent. That was about twice the U.S. average and nearly triple the 2.6 percent average tariff waived in Louisiana.
• North Dakota‘s imports under GSP in 2016 were primarily food products (56 percent), whereas West Virginia‘s imports were auto parts (44 percent). In most states, a single product grouping accounted for at least a quarter of GSP imports.
• Iowa is among the most concentrated states in terms of source countries, with 94 percent of GSP savings on imports from just three countries (India, Brazil, and Thailand) in 2016. Florida is the least concentrated state, with less than half of GSP savings on imports from its top three source countries.
• Idaho importers have paid tariffs on GSP imports more often than not: nearly 60 percent of tariffs waived on imports into the state since 2011 came when GSP was expired, meaning companies paid up front and “hoped for the best” regarding refunds. Conversely, just 33 percent of New Hampshire‘s tariff savings came during expiration periods since 2011.

All reports are available for download, along with other state-specific info, on the state reports page. A sample of the Kentucky report is below.

NAM highlighted the impact on Momentive, a specialty chemicals and materials producer with a presence in 21 states, including manufacturing facilities in New York, Ohio, West Virginia, Florida, North Carolina, Oregon, Indiana and California. Roger McCrary, Momentive’s Vice President for Global Trade Management, noted the trade-offs that companies must make when Congress fails to renew GSP:

“Our ability to remain an innovative, cutting-edge American company requires access to affordable raw materials. With the increase in tariffs resulting from GSP’s expiration, we need to cut from other parts of our budget, such as R&D. That has an impact on our bottom line and future products.”

These trade-offs are faced by all companies, not just manufacturers. Some companies cut R&D. Others reduce purchases (and limit future profit potential), while others still must lay off workers. In each of these cases, though, the result is clear: even a temporary GSP expiration can have a lasting impact.

Kona isn’t the only new company calling on Congress to renew GSP before it expires on July 31. Other new additions include:

• Deringer-Ney, based in Vernon Hills, Illinois (10th District) with additional locations in Bloomfield, Connecticut (1st District), Blaine, Minnesota (6th District), and Marshall, North Carolina (11th District), which imports from India;
• Mullican Flooring, based in Johnson City, Tennessee (1st District) with additional locations in Norton, Virginia (9th District), Ronceverte, West Virginia (3rd District), and Holland, New York (27th District), which imports engineered wood flooring from Indonesia, and
• Von Roll USA, located  in Schenectady, New York (20th District) with additional locations in New Haven, Connecticut (3rd District), Douglasville, Georgia (13th District), Monmouth Junction, New Jersey (12th District), and Cleveland, Ohio (9th District), which imports mica flooring from Brazil.

If you lost track, those companies operate in 12 states and 14 congressional districts – and they represent just four out of the 160+ American companies and associations on the Supporter List.

Not on the list but import under GSP? Make sure to add your name for FREE here so that Congress knows that you need it to renew GSP before it expires on July 31.

West Virginia companies imported an estimated $17.9 million under GSP in 2011, saving them on average 3.5%. India was the most important source of GSP imports, accounting for about 55 percent of the tariff savings. Generator parts were West Virginia’s top import under GSP in 2011 and would have faced average tariffs of 2.5% without GSP.

Yet GSP is set to expire on July 31, 2013, and companies could face tariffs higher tariffs starting on August 1 if Congress does not pass legislation renewing GSP. When GSP expired at the end of 2010, American companies paid nearly $2 million per day, every day, until Congress finally acted 11 months later!

This graphic shows just some of the negative impacts from the last GSP expiration. It also helps explain why more than 335 companies and associations – including at least 3 in West Virginia – joined the 2011 GSP Supporter List urging renewal of the program when it last expired.

Are you a West Virginia company that would be hurt by GSP expiration? If so, please take 30 seconds to let Congress know by adding your name to our free 2013 GSP Supporter List right now.