The China/Section 301 diversion is real. So far in 2021, GSP imports are up 12% for products where Chinese imports face Section 301 tariffs but down 7% for products where Chinese imports don’t face any new Section 301 tariffs. It is impossible to know how much more GSP imports might be up (or Chinese imports down) if GSP expiration hadn’t forced American companies to pay tariffs for those products too. We wrote about how GSP renewal must be a part of any “China trade” conversation here.

Imports into 38 states (plus Puerto Rico) paid at least $1 million in tariffs due to GSP expiration. The map below shows estimated tariffs paid for products claiming GSP by state.

It is critical that Congress renew GSP – with refunds for tariffs paid – as soon as possible. We strongly encourage GSP importers hurt by expiration to answer our new survey here. As always, no company-specific details will be published without permission.

From January-August 2021, American companies paid at least $666 million in extra taxes as a result of GSP expiration. Imports into 36 states (plus Puerto Rico) paid at least $1 million in tariffs from January-July 2021 due to GSP expiration. The map below shows estimated tariffs paid for products claiming GSP by state.

August was the most expensive month of GSP expiration yet both nationally and for 15 states: Alabama, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, and Washington. Tariffs paid on imports into Minnesota were 84% higher than any previous month. For Pennsylvania and Georgia, tariffs paid were 53% and 27% higher than any previous month, respectively.

GSP expiration costs have a direct, negative impact on American workers:

• “GSP can be the difference between making a profit or a loss and without profits we obviously can’t increase wages and benefits” says Charlie Smith of BROSCO, a 4th generation, family-owned millwork distributor in Massachusetts and Maine. “Continued losses put all of our 360 workers’ jobs and livelihoods at risk.”
  
• “We are having challenges staying competitive“ says Ajay Kochhar of A&S Distributors in Salida, California. The 7-worker company has paid over $60,000 in extra taxes on food products from Fiji because of GSP expiration. “We can’t hire and give employees full benefits as this is a major increase.”
  
• “The tariffs when added to the rapidly escalating costs of containers have been devastating” says Sandra Colyer of Lily Koo LLC in Jamestown, North Carolina. “Employees laid off due to Covid are slowly being brought back, but return to work would occur more quickly if money was not being spent on tariffs.”

It is critical that Congress renew GSP – with refunds for tariffs paid – as soon as possible. We strongly encourage GSP importers hurt by expiration to answer our new survey here. As always, no company-specific details will be published without permission.

From January-July 2021, American companies paid at least $565 million in extra taxes as a result of GSP expiration. Imports into 36 states (plus Puerto Rico) paid at least $1 million in tariffs from January-July 2021 due to GSP expiration. The map below shows estimated tariffs paid for products claiming GSP by state.

July was the most expensive month of GSP expiration yet for 12 states: Georgia, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. In Rhode Island, tariffs costs in July were more than the previously three months combined. Tantalum metals used primarily to manufacture electronic components from Kazakhstan and Christmas lights from Cambodia – the two products driving the Rhode Island increase – show the diverse impacts of GSP expiration.

GSP expiration costs have a direct, negative impact on American workers:

• “GSP can be the difference between making a profit or a loss and without profits we obviously can’t increase wages and benefits” says Charlie Smith of BROSCO, a 4th generation, family-owned millwork distributor in Massachusetts and Maine. “Continued losses put all of our 360 workers’ jobs and livelihoods at risk.”
  
• “We are having challenges staying competitive“ says Ajay Kochhar of A&S Distributors in Salida, California. The 7-worker company has paid over $60,000 in extra taxes on food products from Fiji because of GSP expiration. “We can’t hire and give employees full benefits as this is a major increase.”
  
• “The tariffs when added to the rapidly escalating costs of containers have been devastating” says Sandra Colyer of Lily Koo LLC in Jamestown, North Carolina. “Employees laid off due to Covid are slowly being brought back, but return to work would occur more quickly if money was not being spent on tariffs.”

It is critical that Congress renew GSP – with refunds for tariffs paid – as soon as possible. We strongly encourage GSP importers hurt by expiration to answer our new survey here. As always, no company-specific details will be published without permission.

In the first six months of expiration, American companies paid at least $480 million in extra taxes as a result of GSP expiration. Companies in 34 states (plus Puerto Rico) paid at least $1 million in tariffs from January-June 2021 due to GSP expiration. The map below shows estimated tariffs for products claiming GSP paid by state in that period.

June was the most expensive month of GSP expiration yet for 12 states: Alabama, Colorado, Delaware, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, and South Carolina. For Alabama, Colorado, and Delaware, each new month has been the most expensive one yet (e.g., June was more than May, which was more than April, which was more than March…).

The data on tariffs paid is a conservative estimate, and the real figure likely is higher. Why? Estimates only capture products that continued to claim GSP despite expiration. Yet imports of many products that traditionally get GSP have not claimed it in 2021. Tariffs paid on those imports still would be eligible for refunds in the event of a retroactive renewal, but importers would need to file manual requests.

It is critical that Congress renew GSP – with refunds for tariffs paid – as soon as possible. We strongly encourage GSP importers hurt by expiration to answer our new survey here . As always, no company-specific details will be published without permission. Companies that want to help the Coalition for GSP educate policymakers on the importance of GSP should also join the Coalition for GSP and/or add their name to the free GSP supporter list.

In the first five months of expiration, American companies paid at least $397 million in extra taxes as a result of GSP expiration. Companies in 32 states paid at least $1 million in tariffs from January-May 2021 due to GSP expiration. The map below shows estimated tariffs for products claiming GSP paid by state in that period.

May was the most expensive month of GSP expiration yet both nationally and for 19 states: Alabama, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Virginia. In three states – Colorado, Kansas, and New Mexico – tariffs paid in May were at least double any of the previous four months.

While many believe the United States has low tariffs, Colorado companies have paid extra tariffs averaging 11.7% due to GSP expiration. Companies in Maine, Montana, New Hampshire, Utah, and Wisconsin have all paid extra tariffs average 7-10%.

The data on tariffs paid is a conservative estimate, and the real figure likely is higher. Why? Estimates only capture products that continued to claim GSP despite expiration. Yet imports of many products that traditionally get GSP have not claimed it in 2021. Tariffs paid on those imports still would be eligible for refunds in the event of a retroactive renewal, but importers would need to file manual requests.

It is critical that Congress renew GSP – with refunds for tariffs paid – as soon as possible. Companies that want to help the Coalition for GSP educate policymakers on who is hurt by expiration (and how) should:

• join the Coalition for GSP
• add their name to the free GSP supporter list
• answer our very short survey on GSP expiration impacts to date

Some states such as Georgia and North Carolina saw much larger increases in GSP imports and savings compared to the previous year, as shown in the graphic below.

GSP saved Georgia companies $3.9 million in December, up $1.3 million (49 percent) compared to one year earlier. Metal products from Brazil, luggage from Thailand,  and chemicals from India contributed the most to Georgia’s GSP savings increases.

GSP saved North Carolina companies $2.0 million in December, up $577,000 (39 percent) compared to one year earlier. Chemicals from the Philippines, furniture fittings from Thailand, and wood products from Indonesia contributed most to North Carolina’s GSP increases.

In addition to Georgia and North Carolina, companies in 26 other states saw GSP savings increase by at least 20 percent, including: California, Connecticut, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming.

Savings on GSP imports from Indonesia increased by 31 percent compared to December of last year. California companies’ alone imported $4.6 million in silver jewelry under GSP in December. GSP eliminated about $1.5 million in import taxes on mangoes and guavas in December. About two-thirds of those savings were on imports into New Jersey.

*** REMINDER: GSP EXPIRED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1.***

The House passed GSP renewal legislation in February, but the Senate must pass legislation for GSP benefits to resume. Please use our Contact Congress tool to write your Senators about GSP renewal; answer our brief survey on how GSP expiration impacts you, and/or sign up for the free GSP supporter list to show the broad support for renewal.

Last week, the House overwhelming approved GSP renewal legislation (HR 4979) but a vote of 400-2. The statements in support of GSP renewal were as strong as the final vote. Several Members highlighted how GSP savings can help companies lower costs, hire workers, and invest in their businesses and employees:

Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX): “In Texas alone, our local job creators saved more than $76 million. Of course, this is money that our businesses can instead use to hire more workers, expand, and innovate. But think about what it means for families.”

Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC), who helped spearhead last October’s House letter urging GSP renewal: “In 2017, producers in my state saved $17 million on GSP imports through reduced tariffs. There savings translate directly to how much companies can reinvest in their businesses and their employees.”

Rep. Jackie Walorski (R-IN): “GSP helps American manufacturers both big and small cut input costs, which in turn lowers prices for consumers. Companies saved $865 million in import duties in 2017 alone.”

Other went further and highlighted specific companies that would benefit from GSP renewal, including GSP supporter list companies TRInternational and Kona Bicycle in Washington, Primetac in New Jersey, and TopFlite Mfg. in Florida.

Ways and Means Trade Subcommittee Chairman Dave Reichert (R-WA): “In my home state of Washington, GSP saved companies about $11 million in import duties in 2017 — up 30 percent from 2016. 

As just one example, TRInternational, a small but quickly growing veteran-owned chemical distributor in Seattle, relies on GSP to obtain certain chemical raw materials at globally competitive prices.  Our last renewal of GSP in 2015 allowed TRI to hire more employees and increase its capital expenditures.  Many of TRI’s customers are U.S. manufacturers, and TRI’s use of GSP to obtain raw materials at lower prices also makes these manufacturers more competitive. 

For TRI, and for other Washington companies like Kona Bicycle that use the GSP program, their employees, and American consumers, GSP provides significant benefits.”

Ways and Means Trade Subcommittee Ranking Member Bill Pascrell (D-NJ): “Since the expiration of the program, small and medium-sized enterprises have borne the burden of higher costs of products imported under the GSP program.

Consider Primetac, located in Little Ferry, New Jersey, a family-owned business from my district that uses GSP-eligible goods to support their industrial packaging business. When GSP last expired, Primetac was forced to raise prices to compensate for new import taxes. This was no small increase, as the company estimates it paid about $1.5 million in new tariffs during the program’s lapse.

This legislation would provide benefits retroactively to GSP-eligible imports, so that small and medium-sized American companies like Primetac can take full advantage of the benefits of GSP and boost their business’s productivity. It is critical that we act quickly to renew this already expired program to support these firms and their employees.”

Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-FL): “In 2017, U.S. importers enjoyed nearly $865 million in savings on import duties under the GSP program. During the same year, my home state of Florida had $1.2 billion of imports covered by the program and a total of $59 million in savings on import duties—Mr. Speaker, that’s about a 40 percent increase in savings from 2016.

I want to share the story of Mr. Bruce Price, a small business owner in my district who would benefit from renewing the GSP program. He recently told my office that he expects savings in the range of $25,000 to $45,000 per year if the program is renewed. For Mr. Bruce, that amount of savings goes a long way and makes a major difference in his business decision to hire more workers or hold off.

I commend the work that the Ways and Means Trade Subcommittee has done to reinforce our commitment to free and fair trade partnerships around the world. I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of H.R. 4979 to help Mr. Bruce and other small business owners hire more workers.”

Clearly, Members of Congress want to know about the companies impacted by GSP and its expiration. As the GSP Coalition continues to advocate for swift, retroactive GSP renewal, we strongly encourage companies to sign up for our free GSP supporter list and answer our expiration impacts survey.

GSP expiration in 2013 made its products less competitive and cost 3V millions of dollars in lost sales. At the same time, customers that continued purchasing at higher prices were made less competitive by the extra $500,000 in taxes assessed by Customs.

The retroactive GSP renewal by Congress allowed 3V Sigma to build an addition to its warehouse and lowered taxes on the business by hundreds of thousands of dollars. Continued GSP benefits are pivotal for 3V Sigma and the American manufacturers it supplies.

The companies are based in 9 different states and all small businesses. In fact, all have 40 or fewer employees and the typical one has 15 workers.

None of the companies reported eye-popping GSP savings – generally $50,000 or less in 2016 – but those savings are significant for small businesses like dZi Handmade. dZi has 10 employees and saved about $20,000 last year on imports of jewelry, holiday and religious items, incense, wind chimes, and toys from India and Nepal.

Despite their small size, companies are generally both importers and exporters. For example, NOVICA imports from Brazil, Ghana, India, Indonesia, and Thailand under GSP while exporting from the United States to Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Mexico, New Zealand, Singapore, and the UK. Collectively the new supporter list companies reported exporting to 16 countries, with Canada being the most common export destination.

The next potential GSP expiration is less than 9 months away. If you import under GSP, be sure to join our free GSP Supporter List so we can continue making the case for GSP renewal well in advance of the pending expiration date.

GSP Supporter List companies added the week of April 3, 2017:

• A Simpler Time Inc. in Morrisville, North Carolina
• dZi Handmade in Easthampton, Massachusetts
• Eppco Enterprises Inc. in Cleveland, Ohio
• Ganesh Himal Trading LLC in Spokane, Washington
• Mendelson & Associates, Inc. in Los Angeles, California
• MG Golf in Irving, Texas
• Nova Gas Technologies, Inc. in North Charleston, South Carolina
• NOVICA in Santa Monica, California
• S.N.K. Enterprises, Inc. in St. Louis, Missouri
• TopFlite Manufacturing in Miami, Florida

Overall, the value of GSP imports increased by 9 percent and the value of GSP tariff savings increased by 14 percent compared to June 2015. Some states, such as Florida and Kansas, saw much larger increases in GSP imports and savings compared to June 2015, as shown in the graphic below.

In Florida, GSP imports and savings both increased by about 50 percent compared to one year earlier. Ferroalloys from Georgia, jewelry from Bolivia, and plywood from Ecuador all contributed to Florida’s GSP increases.

In Kansas, GSP imports increased by 28 percent and savings from GSP by 53 percent compared to one year earlier. Pesticides from India, ceramic sanitary fixtures (sinks, tubs, toilets, etc.) from Thailand, and building stone from Brazil contributed most to Kansas’ GSP increases.

Imports from the Ukraine nearly doubled, led by increased imports of rare gases by companies in South Carolina. GSP eliminated about $560,000 in import taxes on truck tires in June, with more than $200,000 saved on imports into New Jersey alone.

If your company imports under GSP, be sure to answer our GSP renewal impacts survey here.