lysine – Renew GSP Today https://renewgsptoday.com A resource from the Coalition for GSP Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:09:10 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1 https://renewgsptoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/cropped-CoalitionForGSP-Logo-ICO-32x32.png lysine – Renew GSP Today https://renewgsptoday.com 32 32 GSP and Missouri: Fast Facts https://renewgsptoday.com/2013/01/14/gsp-and-missouri-fast-facts/ Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:09:10 +0000 http://renewgsp.wpengine.com/?p=1885 The Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program eliminates U.S. tariffs (i.e., taxes) on certain imports from developing countries. GSP imports in 2011 totaled $18.5 billion and the program saved American companies more than $700 million. GSP saved Missouri companies an estimated $8.8 million in 2011.

Missouri companies imported an estimated $214 million under GSP in 2011, saving them on average 4.1%. India was the most important source of GSP imports, accounting for about 23 percent of the tariff savings. Lysine was Missouri’s top import under GSP in 2011 and would have faced average tariffs of 3.7% without GSP.

Yet GSP is set to expire on July 31, 2013, and companies could face tariffs higher tariffs starting on August 1 if Congress does not pass legislation renewing GSP. When GSP expired at the end of 2010, American companies paid nearly $2 million per day, every day, until Congress finally acted 11 months later!

This graphic shows just some of the negative impacts from the last GSP expiration. It also helps explain why more than 335 companies and associations – including at least 9 in Missouri – joined the 2011 GSP Supporter List urging renewal of the program when it last expired.

Are you a Missouri company that would be hurt by GSP expiration? If so, please take 30 seconds to let Congress know by adding your name to our free 2013 GSP Supporter List right now.

]]>
2011 GSP Annual Review – Who Loses? https://renewgsptoday.com/2012/07/02/2011-gsp-annual-review-who-loses/ https://renewgsptoday.com/2012/07/02/2011-gsp-annual-review-who-loses/#comments Mon, 02 Jul 2012 21:13:43 +0000 http://renewgsp.wpengine.com/?p=1670 Over the weekend, the Administration announced the results of the 2011 GSP Annual Review.  You can read the Presidential Proclamation here or, if you’d prefer the non-legalese version, here’s a list from USTR that clearly states the decision for each product.

Although it’s gotten little press, the statistics are quite striking.  Seven products were denied “competitive need limit” (CNL) waivers, or had their existing waiver revoked, effectively immediately.  American companies imported $1.5 billion worth of these products under GSP last year, saving $64 million.  Put differently, these products accounted for nearly 10 percent of total GSP savings last year!

But alas, no more savings for American importers of Thai jewelry or tires, Brazilian lysine, Indian hand-hooked carpets or brake parts, Indonesian aluminum alloy plates, or Turkish refined borax.  (Several other products lost GSP benefits as well, but no importers petitioned for continuation, so we didn’t include them on our list.)

We decided to take a look at which states would be impacted most by the changes based on the estimated 2011 GSP savings.  While far from exhaustive, below is a list of some of the top losers, both overall and for specific products:

  • The leading importers of Thai truck/bus tires, California companies saved $10 million on those imports under GSP last year.  All total, GSP for the products that lost benefits yesterday saved CA companies $14 million in 2011.
  • Maryland accounted for nearly a third of Thai silvery jewelry imports last year, saving more than $11 million.
  • GSP benefits saved for the seven products saved New York companies more than $9 million in 2011, including $7 million on jewelry and more than $1 million each on carpets and aluminum alloy sheets.
  • More than 97 percent of all lysine imports under GSP went to just two states: Illinois and Missouri.  Needless to say, there are some unhappy producers in those states today after GSP benefits that saved $3 million last year were revoked.
  • Lysine importers aren’t the only companies in the Land of Lincoln impacted by the decision: GSP saved Illinois companies more than $2 million last year on brake parts from India – about two-thirds of total U.S. tariff savings for those products under GSP.
  • Georgia companies saved $2.3 million last year on imports of Indian carpets – about one-thirds of total U.S. savings.
  • Finally, New Jersey companies saved $4.2 million on imports of aluminum sheets from Indonesia in 2011 – four times as much as importers in the next largest state.
]]>
https://renewgsptoday.com/2012/07/02/2011-gsp-annual-review-who-loses/feed/ 1