In the first four months of expiration, American companies paid at least $308 million in extra taxes as a result of GSP expiration. Companies in 31 states paid at least $1 million in tariffs from January-April 2021 due to GSP expiration. The map below shows estimated tariffs for products claiming GSP paid by state in that period.

April was the most expensive month of GSP expiration yet for 21 states – stretching from Florida to Alaska:

• GSP expiration costs have increased every month in Alabama, Colorado, Delaware, Idaho, Kansas, and Virginia.
• GSP expiration costs were about 4x higher in April than January in both Idaho and Delaware, and nearly 2x higher in Colorado and Alabama.
• The extra $2 million in tariffs paid in April by companies in Indiana is 40% higher than the average in the first three months of the year, while the $370,000 paid by companies in Nevada was 75% over the January to March average.

GSP expiration impacts are getting worse over time.

The data on tariffs paid is a conservative estimate, and the real figure likely is higher. Why? Estimates only capture products that continued to claim GSP despite expiration. Yet imports of many products that traditionally get GSP have not claimed it in 2021. Tariffs paid on those imports still would be eligible for refunds in the event of a retroactive renewal, but importers would need to file manual requests.

GSP expiration is already costing American jobs and raising prices for American companies that need inputs and consumers that purchase finished goods. It is critical that Congress renew GSP – with refunds for tariffs paid – as soon as possible. To help the Coalition for GSP educate policymakers on who is hurt by expiration (and how), companies are strongly encouraged to:

• join the Coalition for GSP
• add their name to the free GSP supporter list
• answer our very short survey on GSP expiration impacts to date

Some states such as Georgia and North Carolina saw much larger increases in GSP imports and savings compared to the previous year, as shown in the graphic below.

GSP saved Georgia companies $3.9 million in December, up $1.3 million (49 percent) compared to one year earlier. Metal products from Brazil, luggage from Thailand,  and chemicals from India contributed the most to Georgia’s GSP savings increases.

GSP saved North Carolina companies $2.0 million in December, up $577,000 (39 percent) compared to one year earlier. Chemicals from the Philippines, furniture fittings from Thailand, and wood products from Indonesia contributed most to North Carolina’s GSP increases.

In addition to Georgia and North Carolina, companies in 26 other states saw GSP savings increase by at least 20 percent, including: California, Connecticut, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming.

Savings on GSP imports from Indonesia increased by 31 percent compared to December of last year. California companies’ alone imported $4.6 million in silver jewelry under GSP in December. GSP eliminated about $1.5 million in import taxes on mangoes and guavas in December. About two-thirds of those savings were on imports into New Jersey.

*** REMINDER: GSP EXPIRED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1.***

The House passed GSP renewal legislation in February, but the Senate must pass legislation for GSP benefits to resume. Please use our Contact Congress tool to write your Senators about GSP renewal; answer our brief survey on how GSP expiration impacts you, and/or sign up for the free GSP supporter list to show the broad support for renewal.

Last week, the House overwhelming approved GSP renewal legislation (HR 4979) but a vote of 400-2. The statements in support of GSP renewal were as strong as the final vote. Several Members highlighted how GSP savings can help companies lower costs, hire workers, and invest in their businesses and employees:

Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX): “In Texas alone, our local job creators saved more than $76 million. Of course, this is money that our businesses can instead use to hire more workers, expand, and innovate. But think about what it means for families.”

Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC), who helped spearhead last October’s House letter urging GSP renewal: “In 2017, producers in my state saved $17 million on GSP imports through reduced tariffs. There savings translate directly to how much companies can reinvest in their businesses and their employees.”

Rep. Jackie Walorski (R-IN): “GSP helps American manufacturers both big and small cut input costs, which in turn lowers prices for consumers. Companies saved $865 million in import duties in 2017 alone.”

Other went further and highlighted specific companies that would benefit from GSP renewal, including GSP supporter list companies TRInternational and Kona Bicycle in Washington, Primetac in New Jersey, and TopFlite Mfg. in Florida.

Ways and Means Trade Subcommittee Chairman Dave Reichert (R-WA): “In my home state of Washington, GSP saved companies about $11 million in import duties in 2017 — up 30 percent from 2016. 

As just one example, TRInternational, a small but quickly growing veteran-owned chemical distributor in Seattle, relies on GSP to obtain certain chemical raw materials at globally competitive prices.  Our last renewal of GSP in 2015 allowed TRI to hire more employees and increase its capital expenditures.  Many of TRI’s customers are U.S. manufacturers, and TRI’s use of GSP to obtain raw materials at lower prices also makes these manufacturers more competitive. 

For TRI, and for other Washington companies like Kona Bicycle that use the GSP program, their employees, and American consumers, GSP provides significant benefits.”

Ways and Means Trade Subcommittee Ranking Member Bill Pascrell (D-NJ): “Since the expiration of the program, small and medium-sized enterprises have borne the burden of higher costs of products imported under the GSP program.

Consider Primetac, located in Little Ferry, New Jersey, a family-owned business from my district that uses GSP-eligible goods to support their industrial packaging business. When GSP last expired, Primetac was forced to raise prices to compensate for new import taxes. This was no small increase, as the company estimates it paid about $1.5 million in new tariffs during the program’s lapse.

This legislation would provide benefits retroactively to GSP-eligible imports, so that small and medium-sized American companies like Primetac can take full advantage of the benefits of GSP and boost their business’s productivity. It is critical that we act quickly to renew this already expired program to support these firms and their employees.”

Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-FL): “In 2017, U.S. importers enjoyed nearly $865 million in savings on import duties under the GSP program. During the same year, my home state of Florida had $1.2 billion of imports covered by the program and a total of $59 million in savings on import duties—Mr. Speaker, that’s about a 40 percent increase in savings from 2016.

I want to share the story of Mr. Bruce Price, a small business owner in my district who would benefit from renewing the GSP program. He recently told my office that he expects savings in the range of $25,000 to $45,000 per year if the program is renewed. For Mr. Bruce, that amount of savings goes a long way and makes a major difference in his business decision to hire more workers or hold off.

I commend the work that the Ways and Means Trade Subcommittee has done to reinforce our commitment to free and fair trade partnerships around the world. I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of H.R. 4979 to help Mr. Bruce and other small business owners hire more workers.”

Clearly, Members of Congress want to know about the companies impacted by GSP and its expiration. As the GSP Coalition continues to advocate for swift, retroactive GSP renewal, we strongly encourage companies to sign up for our free GSP supporter list and answer our expiration impacts survey.

GSP imports were up by 15 percent – and tariffs savings were up by 17 percent – compared to a year earlier. Some states such as Nebraska and Maryland saw much larger increases in GSP imports and savings compared to the previous year, as shown in the graphic below.

GSP saved Nebraska companies $105,000 thousand in June, up $42,000 (68 percent) compared to one year earlier. Activated carbon from the Philippines, copper alloys and rubber stoppers from India, and aluminum frames from Thailand contributed most to Nebraska’s GSP increases.

GSP saved Maryland companies $2.1 million in June, up over $450,000 (28 percent) compared to one year earlier. Silicon from Kazakhstan, carbides from South Africa, and zinc from India contributed most to Maryland’s GSP increases.

In addition to Nebraska and Maryland, companies in 17 other states saw GSP savings increase by at least 20 percent, including: Alabama, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Indiana, Louisiana, Maine, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin.

Savings on GSP imports from Lebanon increased by 58 percent compared to June of last year. Illinois companies’ purchases of nuts accounted for nearly $250,000 of the GSP imports from Lebanon. GSP eliminated about $471,000 in import taxes on steering wheels in June, with more than a fifth of those savings on imports into Michigan.

*** Tariffs on GSP imports are scheduled to go up on January 1. By the time that feels “close,” it may be too late to make a difference in Congress. So if you import under GSP and don’t see your organization here, please add it here today. ***

The companies are based in 11 different states and most are small businesses (Panasonic North America certainly is not). Their imports are as varied as their locations: Engineered Components Company imports cap screws from Thailand; Galaxy Sports imports gloves from Indonesia; Global Chemcorp imports pigments and dyes from India, and Sugarpod Naturals imports dietary supplements from the Philippines.

Two companies – B&C Technologies and Fab-Line Machinery – are among those featured on our Company Profiles page.

The next potential GSP expiration is less than 9 months away. If you import under GSP, be sure to join our free GSP Supporter List so we can continue making the case for GSP renewal well in advance of the pending expiration date.

GSP Supporter List companies added the week of April 10, 2017:

• Andre Prost, Inc. in Old Saybrook, Connecticut
• B&C Technologies LLC in Panama City Beach, Florida
• Bolcof Port Polyers / Calsak Plastics in Azusa, California
• Engineered Components Company in Elgin, Illinois
• Fab-Line Machinery, LLC in Nashville, Tennessee
• Galaxy SPorts, Inc. in South Bend, Indiana
• Global Chemcorp, LLC in Charlotte, North Carolina
• Karran in Vincennes, Indiana
• Organik Kimya US, Inc. in Burlington, Massachusetts
• Panasonic Corporation of North American in Newark, New Jersey
• Sugarpod Naturals in Hillsboro, Oregon
• TRI-K Industries Inc. in Denville, New Jersey
• YGI Group in New York, New York
• Zhong Ya Chemical (USA) Ltd. in Edison, New Jersey

NAM highlighted the impact on Momentive, a specialty chemicals and materials producer with a presence in 21 states, including manufacturing facilities in New York, Ohio, West Virginia, Florida, North Carolina, Oregon, Indiana and California. Roger McCrary, Momentive’s Vice President for Global Trade Management, noted the trade-offs that companies must make when Congress fails to renew GSP:

“Our ability to remain an innovative, cutting-edge American company requires access to affordable raw materials. With the increase in tariffs resulting from GSP’s expiration, we need to cut from other parts of our budget, such as R&D. That has an impact on our bottom line and future products.”

These trade-offs are faced by all companies, not just manufacturers. Some companies cut R&D. Others reduce purchases (and limit future profit potential), while others still must lay off workers. In each of these cases, though, the result is clear: even a temporary GSP expiration can have a lasting impact.

Indiana companies imported an estimated $433 million under GSP in 2011, saving them on average 3.0%. India was the most important source of GSP imports, accounting for about 27 percent of the tariff savings. Ferrosilicon, a key raw material used by steel manufacturers, was Indiana’s top import under GSP in 2011.

Yet GSP is set to expire on July 31, 2013, and companies could face tariffs higher tariffs starting on August 1 if Congress does not pass legislation renewing GSP. When GSP expired at the end of 2010, American companies paid nearly $2 million per day, every day, until Congress finally acted 11 months later!

This graphic shows just some of the negative impacts from the last GSP expiration. It also helps explain why more than 335 companies and associations – including at least 12 in Indiana – joined the 2011 GSP Supporter List urging renewal of the program when it last expired.

Are you an Indiana company that would be hurt by GSP expiration? If so, please take 30 seconds to let Congress know by adding your name to our free 2013 GSP Supporter List right now.