• Top 5 states by tariffs paid due to expiration: California ($287 million), Florida ($98 million), New York ($80 million), Texas ($80 million), Georgia ($61 million)
  
  
• Top 5 states by highest average tariff paid due to expiration: Colorado (12.1%), Maine (11.0%), Wisconsin (9.3%), Montana (9.1%), Utah (9.0%)
  
  
• Top 5 source countries by value of GSP imports: Indonesia ($3.9 billion), Thailand ($3.3 billion), Cambodia ($2.7 billion), Brazil ($2.5 billion), Philippines ($1.9 billion)
  
  
• Top 5 source countries by value of (eventual) tariff savings: Cambodia ($268 million), Indonesia ($218 million), Thailand ($139 million), Philippines ($121 million), Brazil ($94 million)
  
  

Import growth in 2021 was massive. Total U.S. goods imports grew by 21%, while those from GSP countries grew by 35%. Yet “competitive need limitations” (CNLs), which lead to GSP loss for specific products, only grew by 2.6%. As a result, $1.8 billion of the currently eligible imports exceeded the 2021 CNL and another $1.5 billion likely will exceed the 2022 cap based on import levels and trends, putting a huge share of future GSP benefits at risk:

• Top 5 states by share of benefits at risk for exceeding the 2021 CNL: Mississippi (42%), Louisiana (26%), Florida (20%), New York (15%), Virginia (13%)
  
  
• Top 5 states by share of benefits likely at risk from the 2022 CNL: Maine (37%), Colorado (27%), Iowa (27%), Hawaii (19%), Michigan (15%)
  
  

Representatives Stephanie Murphy (D-FL) and Jackie Walorski (R-IN) introduced the bipartisan CNL Update Act (H.R.6171), which would amend the CNLs to grow more in line with historical trends. Not only would the CNL Update Act help preserve GSP for much of that “at risk” trade, it would help restore GSP for some of the $10 billion (!!!) in imports that lost GSP in the past due to product reviews:

• Top 5 states by potential GSP savings increase for products that “should” be restored by H.R.6171: Alaska (84%), South Dakota (72%), Michigan (41%), Maryland (38%), Mississippi (42%)
  
  
• Top 5 states by potential GSP savings increase for products that “may” be restored by H.R.6171: South Dakota (4,565%), Wyoming (218%), Maryland (213%), New York (196%), Minnesota (166%)
  
  

While the CNL Update Act has a chance to “preserve and restore,” there remains considerable down-side risk. The GSP renewal language in the House’s America COMPETES Act not only maintains the current CNL thresholds, but creates a high likelihood of full or partial termination for key GSP supplier countries, particularly Brazil, Cambodia, Myanmar, Philippines, and Thailand. Loss of GSP due to current CNL rules, combined with loss for those countries, would decimate the program:

• States where at least 90% of current GSP benefits are at risk: Wisconsin (-97%), West Virginia (-96%), Montana (-92%), Utah (-91%)
  
  
• States where at least 80% of current GSP benefits are at risk: Colorado (-88%), Connecticut (-86%), Arkansas (-85%), Hawaii (-84%), Wyoming (-83%), Maine (-83%), Alaska (-82%), Kansas (-82%), Mississippi (-82%), Texas (-81%), Indiana (-81%)
  
  
• States where at least 70% of current GSP benefits are at risk: Nebraska (-79%), Georgia (-79%), North Carolina (-79%), Michigan (-79%), Washington (-78%), Rhode Island (-78%), Nevada (-78%), Illinois (-77%), Alabama (-76%), New Mexico (-76%), California (-76%), Minnesota (-75%), Tennessee (-75%), Virginia (-74%), Massachusetts (-74%), Oklahoma (-74%), Kentucky (-73%), South Dakota (-72%), Florida (-72%), Oregon (-71%)
  
  

This last set of stats shows that GSP “renewal” can’t be the only priority. It must be renewed in a way that doesn’t decimate the program in the next 2-3 years. After all, it’s impossible to “promote development through trade” with a program that covers no trade.

From January-July 2021, American companies paid at least $565 million in extra taxes as a result of GSP expiration. Imports into 36 states (plus Puerto Rico) paid at least $1 million in tariffs from January-July 2021 due to GSP expiration. The map below shows estimated tariffs paid for products claiming GSP by state.

July was the most expensive month of GSP expiration yet for 12 states: Georgia, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. In Rhode Island, tariffs costs in July were more than the previously three months combined. Tantalum metals used primarily to manufacture electronic components from Kazakhstan and Christmas lights from Cambodia – the two products driving the Rhode Island increase – show the diverse impacts of GSP expiration.

GSP expiration costs have a direct, negative impact on American workers:

• “GSP can be the difference between making a profit or a loss and without profits we obviously can’t increase wages and benefits” says Charlie Smith of BROSCO, a 4th generation, family-owned millwork distributor in Massachusetts and Maine. “Continued losses put all of our 360 workers’ jobs and livelihoods at risk.”
  
• “We are having challenges staying competitive“ says Ajay Kochhar of A&S Distributors in Salida, California. The 7-worker company has paid over $60,000 in extra taxes on food products from Fiji because of GSP expiration. “We can’t hire and give employees full benefits as this is a major increase.”
  
• “The tariffs when added to the rapidly escalating costs of containers have been devastating” says Sandra Colyer of Lily Koo LLC in Jamestown, North Carolina. “Employees laid off due to Covid are slowly being brought back, but return to work would occur more quickly if money was not being spent on tariffs.”

It is critical that Congress renew GSP – with refunds for tariffs paid – as soon as possible. We strongly encourage GSP importers hurt by expiration to answer our new survey here. As always, no company-specific details will be published without permission.

Due to GSP expiration, Ciranda has paid over $209,000 in extra tariffs on imports of tapioca powders and syrups, coconut products, rice syrup and powders from Brazil, Pakistan, Philippines, and Thailand. The need to pass these costs onto customers led sales to fall. Even if tariffs paid (eventually) are refunded, those lost sales can’t be regained. As an employee-owned company, everyone at Ciranda is impacted by those lost sales and profits.

Ciranda is a great example of the kind of trade GSP is meant to promote. Its qualification process includes an in-person visit to every supplier. While on-site, it observes each ingredient’s journey from the field to the processing plant. In addition to evaluating product quality, it surveys working conditions, fair labor practices, and the overall environmental health of the project. In 2020, Ciranda published a book highlighting the farmers around the world growing their product.

By eliminating U.S. tariffs on sustainable food ingredients, GSP helps companies like Ciranda do “more good” for workers and the environment in developing countries and the United States. Their example also highlights the risk of imposing too many eligible criteria on GSP countries for which higher tariffs are the only possible punishment. No matter how well-intentioned a new GSP criterion (e.g., on environment) may be, terminating GSP often hurts those meeting or exceeding even the highest standards. That’s why the Coalition believes Congress should consider changes to mitigate any punitive actions as part of GSP renewal, such as supporting partial (instead of full) terminations and/or creating a mechanism for good actors to retain benefits.

Note: Ciranda’s story came from a new Coalition survey on expiration impacts. GSP importers can take the survey here.

In the first five months of expiration, American companies paid at least $397 million in extra taxes as a result of GSP expiration. Companies in 32 states paid at least $1 million in tariffs from January-May 2021 due to GSP expiration. The map below shows estimated tariffs for products claiming GSP paid by state in that period.

May was the most expensive month of GSP expiration yet both nationally and for 19 states: Alabama, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Virginia. In three states – Colorado, Kansas, and New Mexico – tariffs paid in May were at least double any of the previous four months.

While many believe the United States has low tariffs, Colorado companies have paid extra tariffs averaging 11.7% due to GSP expiration. Companies in Maine, Montana, New Hampshire, Utah, and Wisconsin have all paid extra tariffs average 7-10%.

The data on tariffs paid is a conservative estimate, and the real figure likely is higher. Why? Estimates only capture products that continued to claim GSP despite expiration. Yet imports of many products that traditionally get GSP have not claimed it in 2021. Tariffs paid on those imports still would be eligible for refunds in the event of a retroactive renewal, but importers would need to file manual requests.

It is critical that Congress renew GSP – with refunds for tariffs paid – as soon as possible. Companies that want to help the Coalition for GSP educate policymakers on who is hurt by expiration (and how) should:

• join the Coalition for GSP
• add their name to the free GSP supporter list
• answer our very short survey on GSP expiration impacts to date

California accounts for more than a quarter of GSP savings, more than the next 3 states – New York, Florida, Texas – combined. Georgia, New Jersey, Ohio, Illinois, Washington, and Pennsylvania round out the top 10 states for GSP savings in 2020.

Estimated GSP savings for Colorado grew from $4 million in 2019 to $14 million in 2020, by far the largest increase. Estimated GSP savings also grew in Wisconsin (+$869,000), Arkansas (+$478,000), Washington (+$300,000), Delaware (+$73,000), and Wyoming (+$34,000). Estimated savings fell in all other states.

While Covid-19 had big impacts on GSP imports in the spring, declines were largely due to country suspensions. Excluding products impacted by country suspensions (e.g., India, Turkey, Thailand), most states’ GSP savings grew. For example, New York’s GSP savings grew by $15 million on non-impacted products but fell by $2.5 million overall due to country suspensions. Similarly, Texas’ savings GSP by $9 million on non-impacted products but fell by over $7 million overall.

Since GSP expired on December 31, American likely have paid about $110 million in tariffs that previously would’ve been “GSP savings.” It is critical that Congress renew GSP – with refunds for tariffs paid – as soon as possible. To help the Coalition for GSP educate policymakers on who is hurt by expiration (and how), companies are strongly encouraged to:

• join the Coalition for GSP
• add their name to the free GSP supporter list
• answer our very short survey on GSP expiration impacts to date

GSP imports were up by 14 percent – and tariffs savings were up by 25 percent – compared to November 2016. Year-to-date savings from GSP are up $118 million, or nearly $11 million per month, over the first 11 months of 2016.

November was the first month that U.S. government data started reflecting imports under the recent travel goods expansion (though companies have been saving since July 1). GSP savings on travel goods jumped about $5 million from October to November and July-October savings likely will be revised up by similar amounts.

Some states such as Louisiana and New York saw much larger increases in GSP imports and savings compared to the previous year, as shown in the graphic below.

GSP saved Louisiana companies $1.0 million in November, up $529,000 (104 percent) compared to one year earlier. Ferrochromium from South Africa, zinc from India, and tropical plywood from Cambodia contributed the most to Louisiana’s GSP savings increases.

GSP saved New York companies $7.2 million in November, up $2.3 million (46 percent) compared to one year earlier. Chemicals from India and Brazil, jewelry from Indonesia, and eye-wear from Thailand contributed most to New York’s GSP increases.

In addition to Louisiana and New York, companies in 25 other states saw GSP savings increase by at least 20 percent, including: Alabama, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

Savings on GSP imports from Egypt increased by 30 percent compared to November of last year. Texas companies’ alone imported $836,000 in activated clays under GSP in November. GSP eliminated about $10 million (!) in import taxes on travel goods in November, the first month the data reflect the recent expansion. About one-third of those savings were on imports into New Jersey.

*** REMINDER: GSP EXPIRED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1.***

Please see our expiration post on what to do now to expedite any potential refund process and help renew GSP swiftly.

• That is the highest reported monthly savings since October 2008.
• GSP imports were up by 17 percent – and tariffs savings were up by 21 percent – compared to August 2016.
• Year-to-date savings from GSP are up $72 million, or $9 million per month, over the first 8 months of 2016.

All that despite the fact that August savings are likely significantly understated: official U.S. government data show no claimed GSP benefits for imports of travel goods from countries such as Thailand and the Philippines in July or August despite a recent program expansion.

Put differently: GSP program usage is booming. Some states such as New Jersey and Texas saw much larger increases in GSP imports and savings compared to the previous year, as shown in the graphic below.

GSP saved New Jersey companies $7.4 million in August, up over $2.3 million (45 percent) compared to one year earlier. Travel goods from Burma and Cambodia, precious metal compounds from South Africa, and stone products from Brazil contributed most to New Jersey’s GSP increases.

GSP saved Texas companies $7.1 million in August, up over $1.7 million (32 percent) compared to one year earlier. Industrial machinery from Thailand, PET resin from Brazil, and stainless steel flanges from India contributed most to Texas’ GSP increases.

In addition to New Jersey and Texas, companies in 17 other states saw GSP savings increase by at least 20 percent, including: Alabama, Alaska, Delaware, Florida, Indiana, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.

Savings on GSP imports from Cambodia increased by 307 percent compared to August of last year. New York companies’ purchases of travel goods from Cambodia alone resulted in $740,000 in GSP savings. As companies gear up for the holiday season, GSP eliminated about $1.4 million in import taxes on Christmas lights in August, with over $250,000 of those savings coming from imports into Washington.

*** REMINDER: GSP EXPIRES IN JUST A FEW MONTHS.***

Please use our Contact Congress page to write your Members today about the need to renew GSP today. That page makes it quick and easy to email both Senators and your Representative. All you need to do is: 1) enter your contact info, 2) enter a few sentences about your company/GSP imports, and 3) click send.

GSP imports were up by 15 percent – and tariffs savings were up by 17 percent – compared to a year earlier. Some states such as Nebraska and Maryland saw much larger increases in GSP imports and savings compared to the previous year, as shown in the graphic below.

GSP saved Nebraska companies $105,000 thousand in June, up $42,000 (68 percent) compared to one year earlier. Activated carbon from the Philippines, copper alloys and rubber stoppers from India, and aluminum frames from Thailand contributed most to Nebraska’s GSP increases.

GSP saved Maryland companies $2.1 million in June, up over $450,000 (28 percent) compared to one year earlier. Silicon from Kazakhstan, carbides from South Africa, and zinc from India contributed most to Maryland’s GSP increases.

In addition to Nebraska and Maryland, companies in 17 other states saw GSP savings increase by at least 20 percent, including: Alabama, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Indiana, Louisiana, Maine, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin.

Savings on GSP imports from Lebanon increased by 58 percent compared to June of last year. Illinois companies’ purchases of nuts accounted for nearly $250,000 of the GSP imports from Lebanon. GSP eliminated about $471,000 in import taxes on steering wheels in June, with more than a fifth of those savings on imports into Michigan.

Some states such as Kentucky and Virginia saw much larger increases in GSP imports and savings compared to the previous year, as shown in the graphic below.

GSP saved Kentucky companies $1.2 million in April, up over $307,000 (35 percent) compared to one year earlier. Yeasts from Brazil, electric motors from the Philippines, and wire harnesses from Indonesia contributed most to Kentucky’s GSP increases.

GSP saved Virginia companies $1.6 million in April, up over $555,000 (52 percent) compared to one year earlier. Plastics and auto parts from Brazil, travel goods from Cambodia, and from strawberries from Egypt contributed most to Virginia’s GSP increases.

In addition to Kentucky and Virginia, companies in 14 other states saw GSP savings increase by at least 20 percent, including: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Indiana, Louisiana, Maine, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, and Wisconsin.

Savings on GSP imports from Serbia increased by 25 percent compared to April of last year. Oklahoma companies’ purchases of auto parts accounted for nearly 20 percent of GSP imports from Serbia. GSP eliminated about $100,000 in import taxes on crab meat in April, with about a quarter of those savings on imports into Maryland.

More monthly GSP import and savings highlights are on our Graphics page.

REMINDER: GSP expires at the end of 2017. Click here to learn about ways to take action and support GSP renewal this year.

In the first quarter of 2017, GSP imports were basically flat by value and up about 2 percent in terms of tariff savings compared to 2016. The graduation of Uruguay and Venezuela from GSP effective January 1, 2017 contributes to the slow year-over-year growth.

Despite the mixed growth of GSP import values and savings, some states such as Wisconsin and Michigan saw large increases in GSP imports and savings compared to March 2016, as shown in the graphic below.

GSP saved Wisconsin companies $1.3 million in March, up over $420,000 (49 percent) compared to one year earlier. Optical equipment from the Philippines, metalworking machinery from Brazil, and ceramic plumbing goods from India contributed most to Wisconsin’s GSP increases.

GSP saved Michigan companies $2.8 million in March, up over $620,000 (28 percent) compared to one year earlier. Engines from Thailand, wire harnesses from Indonesia, and machine tools from India contributed most to Michigan’s GSP increases.

In addition to Wisconsin and Michigan, companies in 12 other states saw GSP savings increase by at least 20 percent, including: Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Indiana, Louisiana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Utah, and Vermont.

Savings on GSP imports from Jordan increased by 157 percent compared to March last year. Illinois companies’ purchases of chickpeas accounted for more than 10 percent of GSP imports from Jordan. GSP eliminated about $770,000 in import taxes on wire harnesses in March, with about 20 percent of those savings on imports into Tennessee.

More monthly GSP import and savings highlights are on our Graphics page.

REMINDER: GSP expires at the end of 2017. Click here to learn about ways to take action and support GSP renewal this year.