• Top 5 states by tariffs paid due to expiration: California ($287 million), Florida ($98 million), New York ($80 million), Texas ($80 million), Georgia ($61 million)
  
  
• Top 5 states by highest average tariff paid due to expiration: Colorado (12.1%), Maine (11.0%), Wisconsin (9.3%), Montana (9.1%), Utah (9.0%)
  
  
• Top 5 source countries by value of GSP imports: Indonesia ($3.9 billion), Thailand ($3.3 billion), Cambodia ($2.7 billion), Brazil ($2.5 billion), Philippines ($1.9 billion)
  
  
• Top 5 source countries by value of (eventual) tariff savings: Cambodia ($268 million), Indonesia ($218 million), Thailand ($139 million), Philippines ($121 million), Brazil ($94 million)
  
  

Import growth in 2021 was massive. Total U.S. goods imports grew by 21%, while those from GSP countries grew by 35%. Yet “competitive need limitations” (CNLs), which lead to GSP loss for specific products, only grew by 2.6%. As a result, $1.8 billion of the currently eligible imports exceeded the 2021 CNL and another $1.5 billion likely will exceed the 2022 cap based on import levels and trends, putting a huge share of future GSP benefits at risk:

• Top 5 states by share of benefits at risk for exceeding the 2021 CNL: Mississippi (42%), Louisiana (26%), Florida (20%), New York (15%), Virginia (13%)
  
  
• Top 5 states by share of benefits likely at risk from the 2022 CNL: Maine (37%), Colorado (27%), Iowa (27%), Hawaii (19%), Michigan (15%)
  
  

Representatives Stephanie Murphy (D-FL) and Jackie Walorski (R-IN) introduced the bipartisan CNL Update Act (H.R.6171), which would amend the CNLs to grow more in line with historical trends. Not only would the CNL Update Act help preserve GSP for much of that “at risk” trade, it would help restore GSP for some of the $10 billion (!!!) in imports that lost GSP in the past due to product reviews:

• Top 5 states by potential GSP savings increase for products that “should” be restored by H.R.6171: Alaska (84%), South Dakota (72%), Michigan (41%), Maryland (38%), Mississippi (42%)
  
  
• Top 5 states by potential GSP savings increase for products that “may” be restored by H.R.6171: South Dakota (4,565%), Wyoming (218%), Maryland (213%), New York (196%), Minnesota (166%)
  
  

While the CNL Update Act has a chance to “preserve and restore,” there remains considerable down-side risk. The GSP renewal language in the House’s America COMPETES Act not only maintains the current CNL thresholds, but creates a high likelihood of full or partial termination for key GSP supplier countries, particularly Brazil, Cambodia, Myanmar, Philippines, and Thailand. Loss of GSP due to current CNL rules, combined with loss for those countries, would decimate the program:

• States where at least 90% of current GSP benefits are at risk: Wisconsin (-97%), West Virginia (-96%), Montana (-92%), Utah (-91%)
  
  
• States where at least 80% of current GSP benefits are at risk: Colorado (-88%), Connecticut (-86%), Arkansas (-85%), Hawaii (-84%), Wyoming (-83%), Maine (-83%), Alaska (-82%), Kansas (-82%), Mississippi (-82%), Texas (-81%), Indiana (-81%)
  
  
• States where at least 70% of current GSP benefits are at risk: Nebraska (-79%), Georgia (-79%), North Carolina (-79%), Michigan (-79%), Washington (-78%), Rhode Island (-78%), Nevada (-78%), Illinois (-77%), Alabama (-76%), New Mexico (-76%), California (-76%), Minnesota (-75%), Tennessee (-75%), Virginia (-74%), Massachusetts (-74%), Oklahoma (-74%), Kentucky (-73%), South Dakota (-72%), Florida (-72%), Oregon (-71%)
  
  

This last set of stats shows that GSP “renewal” can’t be the only priority. It must be renewed in a way that doesn’t decimate the program in the next 2-3 years. After all, it’s impossible to “promote development through trade” with a program that covers no trade.

March was the most expensive month yet of GSP expiration: the $88 million in extra tariffs paid far exceeded the $65-$70 million paid in January and February. In the first three months of expiration, American companies paid at least $225 million in extra taxes as a result of GSP expiration.

Companies in 28 states paid at least $1 million in tariffs in the first quarter of 2021 due to GSP expiration. The map below shows estimated tariffs for products claiming GSP paid by state.

In Oregon, the March tariff costs exceeded January and February combined. It wasn’t just one product. March was the most expensive month yet for Oregon GSP importers of optical equipment and coconut flour from the Philippines, sweeteners and plywood from Indonesia, rubber gloves from Thailand, and wooden doors from Brazil. And it wasn’t just Oregon: companies in Delaware, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming all paid more in March than in January and February combined.

As is so often the case, GSP expiration contributes to larger national issues such as surging lumber costs (WSJ: Lumber Prices Break New Records, Adding Heat to Home Prices, CNN: New homes cost $36,000 more because of an epic shortage of lumber). In the first quarter, the GSP tariff impact on plywood and veneers grew 118% from $4.8 million in 2020 to $10.5 million in 2021. (In 2020, these were savings, but in 2021 they must be paid due to expiration.) The tariff impact nearly tripled compared to 2019. Plywood and veneers ranked 6th in terms of GSP tariff impacts so far in 2021, up from 25th in 2019. It’s not just plywood and flooring-related products: GSP imports of wooden doors are up 40% in 2021 and builders joinery are up 96%.

The data on tariffs paid is a conservative estimate, and the real figure likely is higher. Why? Estimates only capture products that continued to claim GSP despite expiration. Yet imports of many products that traditionally get GSP have not claimed it in 2021. Tariffs paid on those imports still would be eligible for refunds in the event of a retroactive renewal, but importers would need to file manual requests.

GSP expiration is already costing American jobs and raising prices for American companies that need inputs and consumers that purchase finished goods. It is critical that Congress renew GSP – with refunds for tariffs paid – as soon as possible. To help the Coalition for GSP educate policymakers on who is hurt by expiration (and how), companies are strongly encouraged to:

• write their lawmakers about GSP renewal with our Contact Congress tool
• join the Coalition for GSP
• add their name to the free GSP supporter list
• answer our very short survey on GSP expiration impacts to date

In the first two months of 2018, companies paid $145 million. That includes only products that claimed GSP despite the expiration. Companies have until September 19 to claim refunds manually, so actual refunds paid for January-February likely will be higher than $145 million.

GSP imports were up by 8 percent compared to February 2017. Had companies not been forced to pay them, tariff savings would have increased by 17 percent. Arizona and Utah were among the states with the biggest increases in tariffs paid because of expiration, as shown in the graphic below.

GSP expiration cost Arizona companies $422,000 in February. Potential savings were up $238,000 (130 percent) compared to one year earlier. Chemicals from India, fashion accessories and conveyor belts from Thailand, and tires from Indonesia contributed most to the increases.

GSP expiration cost Utah companies $313,000 in February. Potential savings were up $120,000 (62 percent) compared to one year earlier. Bicycles from Cambodia and travel goods and compressor pumps from the Philippines contributed most to the increases.

In addition to Arizona and Utah, companies in 20 other statessaw potential GSP savings increase by at least 20 percent, including: Alaska, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon, South Dakota, Washington, and Wyoming.

Potential savings on GSP imports from Ukraine increased by 195 percent compared to February of last year. Chocolate products into Pennsylvania accounted for nearly a third of imports from Ukraine. Companies paid about $1.1 million in tariffs on plywood, led by importers in Florida.

*** REMINDER: GSP GOES BACK INTO EFFECT APRIL 22 BUT PRODUCT- AND COUNTRY-SPECIFIC BENEFITS MAY BE AT RISK AS PART OF ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW PROCESS.***

While GSP has been renewed through 2020, we encourage GSP program users to sign up for the free GSP Supporter List to receive periodic updates on such issues such as refunds and the Annual Review process.

GSP imports were up by 14 percent – and tariffs savings were up by 25 percent – compared to November 2016. Year-to-date savings from GSP are up $118 million, or nearly $11 million per month, over the first 11 months of 2016.

November was the first month that U.S. government data started reflecting imports under the recent travel goods expansion (though companies have been saving since July 1). GSP savings on travel goods jumped about $5 million from October to November and July-October savings likely will be revised up by similar amounts.

Some states such as Louisiana and New York saw much larger increases in GSP imports and savings compared to the previous year, as shown in the graphic below.

GSP saved Louisiana companies $1.0 million in November, up $529,000 (104 percent) compared to one year earlier. Ferrochromium from South Africa, zinc from India, and tropical plywood from Cambodia contributed the most to Louisiana’s GSP savings increases.

GSP saved New York companies $7.2 million in November, up $2.3 million (46 percent) compared to one year earlier. Chemicals from India and Brazil, jewelry from Indonesia, and eye-wear from Thailand contributed most to New York’s GSP increases.

In addition to Louisiana and New York, companies in 25 other states saw GSP savings increase by at least 20 percent, including: Alabama, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

Savings on GSP imports from Egypt increased by 30 percent compared to November of last year. Texas companies’ alone imported $836,000 in activated clays under GSP in November. GSP eliminated about $10 million (!) in import taxes on travel goods in November, the first month the data reflect the recent expansion. About one-third of those savings were on imports into New Jersey.

*** REMINDER: GSP EXPIRED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1.***

Please see our expiration post on what to do now to expedite any potential refund process and help renew GSP swiftly.

GSP imports were up by 22 percent – and tariffs savings were up by 28 percent – compared to October 2016. Year-to-date savings from GSP are up $102 million, or about $10 million per month, over the first 10 months of 2016.

And those reported savings remain significantly understated: official U.S. government data on GSP imports won’t start reflecting imports under the recent travel goods expansion until next month (though companies have been saving since July 1). Including the travel goods savings could add $5-$10 million more in benefits for American companies per month.

Some states such as Massachusetts and Kansas saw much larger increases in GSP imports and savings compared to the previous year, as shown in the graphic below.

GSP saved Massachusetts companies $792,000 in October, up $274,000 (53 percent) compared to one year earlier. Sports gloves from Thailand, optical equipment from the Philippines, and aluminum profiles from Turkey contributed the most to Massachusetts’ GSP savings increases.

GSP saved Kansas companies $277,000 in October, up $163,000 (143 percent) compared to one year earlier. Inorganic acids and pesticides from India, and rubber piping from Brazil contributed most to Kansas’ GSP increases.

In addition to Massachusetts and Kansas, companies in 26 other states saw GSP savings increase by at least 20 percent, including: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington.

Savings on GSP imports from India increased by 30 percent compared to October of last year. Iowa companies’ purchases of carboxylic acids alone resulted in $282,000 in GSP savings. GSP eliminated about $698,000 in import taxes on aluminum foil in October, with $107,000 of those savings coming from imports into Illinois.

*** REMINDER: GSP EXPIRES IN JUST A FEW WEEKS.***

Please use our Contact Congress page to write your Members today about the need to renew GSP today (the letter text was updated December 5). That page makes it quick and easy to email both Senators and your Representative. All you need to do is: 1) enter your contact info, 2) enter a few sentences about your company/GSP imports, and 3) click send.

The large increases come despite the fact that July, August, and September savings appear significantly understated: official U.S. government data show no claimed GSP benefits for imports of travel goods from countries such as Thailand and the Philippines in July or August despite a recent program expansion. So not only is GSP program usage is booming, it’s likely that data on savings will be revised up considerably in the near future.

Some states such as Oklahoma and Florida saw much larger increases in GSP imports and savings compared to the previous year, as shown in the graphic below.

GSP saved Oklahoma companies $316,000 in September, up $126,000 (67 percent) compared to one year earlier. Taps and cocks and artificial plants from India, rubber hoses from Turkey, and ceramic wares from Indonesia contributed most to Oklahoma’s GSP savings increases.

GSP saved Florida companies $4.8 million in September, up $1.3 million (36 percent) compared to one year earlier. Tropical plywood from Ecuador, travel goods from Burma and Cambodia, and motor boats from South Africa contributed most to Florida’s GSP increases.

In addition to Oklahoma and Florida, companies in 21 other states saw GSP savings increase by at least 20 percent, including: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Delaware, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, South Dakota, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

Savings on GSP imports from Pakistan increased by 52 percent compared to September of last year. New York companies’ purchases of jewelry alone resulted in $179,000 in GSP savings. GSP eliminated about $500,000 in import taxes on valves in September, with about half of those savings coming from imports into Texas.

*** REMINDER: GSP EXPIRES IN JUST A FEW MONTHS.***

Please use our Contact Congress page to write your Members today about the need to renew GSP today. That page makes it quick and easy to email both Senators and your Representative. All you need to do is: 1) enter your contact info, 2) enter a few sentences about your company/GSP imports, and 3) click send.

Some states such as Pennsylvania and Iowa saw much larger increases in GSP imports and savings compared to the previous year, as shown in the graphic below.

GSP saved Pennsylvania companies $2.8 million in July, up over $1.1 million (63 percent) compared to one year earlier. Chromium from Kazakhstan, candy from Thailand, and pesticides from India contributed most to Pennsylvania’s GSP increases.

GSP saved Iowa companies $715,000 in July, up over $283,000 (65 percent) compared to one year earlier. Pesticides from India, gelatin from Brazil, and rubber piping from Turkey contributed most to Iowa’s GSP increases.

In addition to Pennsylvania and Iowa, companies in 21 other states saw GSP savings increase by at least 20 percent, including: Alabama, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, Virginia, and Wyoming.

Savings on GSP imports from Sri Lanka increased by 51 percent compared to July of last year. Ohio companies’ purchases of activated carbon accounted for nearly $1.4 million GSP imports from Sri Lanka. GSP eliminated about $548,000 in import taxes on packaging plastics in July, with approximately a quarter of those savings coming from imports into South Carolina.

*** REMINDER: GSP EXPIRES IN JUST A FEW MONTHS.***

Please use our Contact Congress page to write your Members today about the need to renew GSP today. That page makes it quick and easy to email both Senators and your Representative. All you need to do is: 1) enter your contact info, 2) enter a few sentences about your company/GSP imports, and 3) click send.

Some states, such as Arizona and Minnesota, saw particularly large increases in GSP imports and savings compared to January 2016, as shown in the graphic below.

GSP saved Arizona companies $706,000 in January, up $215,000 (44 percent) compared to one year earlier. Semiprecious stones from Brazil and Madagascar, chemicals from India, and plastic statues and decorative items from the Philippines contributed most to Arizona’s GSP increases.

GSP saved Minnesota companies $413,000 in January, up $95,000 (30 percent) compared to one year earlier. Aluminum structures from Thailand, optical lenses from Indonesia and Thailand, and measuring instruments from the Philippines contributed most to Minnesota’s GSP increases.

The increase in GSP savings for American companies has been shared broadly. In addition to Arizona and Minnesota, companies in 16 other states saw GSP savings increase by at least 20 percent, including: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Louisiana, Maine, New Hampshire, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, and Wisconsin.

Savings on GSP imports from Turkey increased by 23 percent compared to January last year. Georgia companies’ purchases of tires were among the top GSP imports from Turkey. GSP eliminated about $100,000 in import taxes on air bags and parts in January, with nearly all of those savings on imports from Thailand into Utah.

REMINDER: GSP EXPIRES AT THE END OF 2017. Click here to learn about ways to take action and support GSP renewal this year.

Taxes paid range from a high of $134 million in California to a low of $153,000 in South Dakota. Even states with low(er) total taxes paid often bear the brunt for specific products. For example:

• South Dakota accounted for more than a third of taxes paid on wooden statuettes from Sri Lanka;
• Wyoming accounted for more than 80 percent of taxes paid on bone char imports from Brazil,
• West Virginia accounted for more than 80 percent of taxes paid on iron cores for ignition systems from Thailand.

This often reflects a single importer being hit with higher taxes on niche products. And they will continue to do so until Congress renews GSP.

We’ve added 13 companies to the supporter list in June, 12 of which we’d never heard of or from. These “previously unknown” companies have paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in tariffs since GSP expired. That begs the question: how many more companies are significantly impacted by GSP expiration – and how do we find them?

Sometimes we come across new companies in our research. The other day, we noticed that Mississippi accounted for 70 percent of dishwasher (HTS 8422.11.00) imports from Turkey since 2013. These dishwashers tends to come in under GSP or not at all, any without GSP the import taxes over that period would exceed $110K. A quick search of Panjiva showed numerous import shipments by Greenwood, Mississippi-based Viking Range Corporation. We’ve tried contacting Viking about adding its name, so hopefully it will be on there soon!

But sometimes it’s not so easy to identify importers. Take for example rubber hoses (HTS 4009.21.00) from Thailand. Iowa is the top state importer, followed by South Dakota, where account for nearly 50 percent of the State’s estimated GSP imports since the beginning of 2013! Yet Panjiva searches don’t turn up any importers in either state during that time. The task gets harder as the GSP import values (or shares) get smaller. So all we can do is hope the companies are contacting Congress directly about the importance of GSP – or that a Google search leads them to our join the supporter list page…

Given the second situation, it’s impossible to come up with an exact list, but here’s what we know:

• 570+ companies and associations have publicly supported GSP renewal
• hundreds more companies (like Viking) that likely are hurt by GSP expiration have been identified in our research, but are not yet on the supporter list
• hundreds or thousands more companies likely also would benefit from GSP renewal, but we can’t know who they are unless they contact us

So if you’re one of those mystery companies, please add your add your name to the supporter list. It’s free and the only way to demonstrate the importance of GSP to companies across the United States.